Subscribe to receive the most important news
The State Information Service commented on what was issued by the official Turkish authorities regarding the legal measures taken by the relevant Egyptian authorities towards one of the illegal electronic media committees in Egypt.
In a statement, on Thursday, the authority clarified that, due to the fallacies and lies contained in these statements issued by both the presidency and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Turkey, the General Information Authority, as the authority responsible for accrediting foreign media offices and correspondents in Egypt, clarifies the following:
First: According to the rules in force internationally, the accreditation systems for foreign correspondents are regulated by the domestic legislation in each country, which is included in the third paragraph of Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
- According to these rules, the Information Agency is the body responsible for approving and organizing the work of correspondents for foreign media in Egypt, according to the contents of the Republican Decree establishing the Authority No. 1820 of 1967.
- According to these rules, there are now about 300 accredited foreign media offices in Egypt that include about 1500 accredited and resident journalists and correspondents, in addition to an average of about 100 visiting journalists per month on average.
- During the past six years, none of these foreign correspondents was exposed in the performance of their work, which doubled their number from 920 accredited and resident correspondents since 2014 to about 1500 currently with an increase rate of 63%.
- Nor was the resort to the right of the General Information Service to close any office of any foreign media or deport any journalist, except for one case that was a British journalist who did not have any valid permit to practice the press work, and the relevant authorities took legal measures towards what he had committed of abuse In 2018.
And this is despite the scores of professional abuses, political bias and inaccuracies issued by accredited journalists and reporters in Cairo, without prejudice to any of them or their accredited offices out of respect for freedom of the media and the principles of journalistic work.
Second: Regarding the legal status of Anatolia News Agency:
The official Turkish data included allegations that the individuals who were arrested and the headquarters in which they were conducting their activities were affiliated with the official Turkish Anatolia News Agency.
- Anatolia News Agency had one accredited correspondent in Cairo in the early 1990s, and he was deported from the country at the time for his involvement in a smuggling case between Egypt and Turkey.
- In 2010, the agency opened an office in Cairo, which was approved by the Press Center of the State Information Service.
- In 2012 the agency applied to convert its Cairo office to a regional office that included 42 reporters, photographers and technicians.
- In 2013, due to the violations committed by the workers in Anatolia in Cairo in the aftermath of the accreditation granted to them in the aftermath of the June 30 Revolution, the relevant authorities closed the office on August 29 2013, and since that date the official Turkish Anatolia Agency has no legal presence in Egypt, As all attempts made by the Turkish embassy in Egypt to accredit the agency’s reporters were rejected, and this refusal is an exercise of the full and guaranteed right of every country on its lands.
Third: What the Turkish data contained in a talk about linking the activity of individuals who were arrested with the Turkish role in the region, especially in Libya, reveals the nature of the mission of this group, which was, in recognition of Turkish data, playing a role in the context of hostile Turkish policy towards Egypt, and violates Egyptian laws and regulations To play this role. ”
At the end of its statement, the commission confirmed to foreign correspondents accredited and residing in Egypt its concern for freedom of the press and expression, and its commitment to internationally recognized professional rules in the practice of journalistic work, guaranteed to everyone who abides by the rules of accreditation and the established procedures.