Ziad Al-Alimi and others included the Hope Cell on the lists of terrorism


The Department of Terrorism 5 decided to include Ziad Al-Alimi and 12 others accused of the cell of hope on the terrorist lists, for a period of 5 years.

The court said that it was legally scheduled that the lists of terrorist entities and terrorists were based on fulfilling Egypt’s international obligations to the United Nations Charter, especially binding Security Council resolutions.

Article 237 of the Egyptian constitution organized the matter regarding the state’s commitment to confront terrorism in all its forms and forms, and traced its sources of financing according to a specific time program as a threat to the homeland and citizens while ensuring rights and freedoms.

The decision also stated that Brotherhood leaders fleeing abroad, including Mahmoud Fathi Badr, and Ahmed Mohamed Abdel-Hadry, against Mr. Ahmed Batikh, held organizational meetings during which they laid out a plan aimed at providing the necessary financial support to finance their hostile movement against the Egyptian state and harming the national interest and economic security And carrying out hostile operations against officers and members of the army and the police, with the aim of overthrowing the state system and assigning them to the group’s elements and some of the altruistic elements associated with them inside, including those held in custody of some cases, including the imprisoned members of the organization, Muhammad Abdul Rahman Morsi, Rami Nabil Shaat , Muhammad Abu Hurairah, Khalid Ahmed Abu Shadi, Ziad Abdel Hamid Al-Alimi, during which they agreed to activate the role of the financial support committees for the elements of the Brotherhood, by exploiting the profits of the economic entities of the group and receiving funds from the fleeing leaders from abroad and collecting donations from the elements of the group inside, To provide logistical support of weapons and explosives to carry out their hostile plan against the state.

Investigations attributed to the defendants in the Hope Cell case, which bear No. 930 of 2019, restricting the security of a state, including charges of committing crimes of participation with a group established in contravention of the provisions of the law, the purpose of which is to call for the disruption of the provisions of the constitution and laws and to prevent state institutions and public authorities from carrying out their work, and the publication of news and information And deliberately false statements about the political and economic conditions in the country with the intention of disturbing the public peace and undermining confidence in state institutions.

Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here