Not accepting the lawsuit to revoke the license of the Sada Al Balad channel and preventing Schubert from appearing


Books – Muhammad Napoleon

Posted in: Monday 28 September 2020 – 1:44 PM | Last updated: Monday, September 28, 2020 – 1:44 PM

The Second Circuit of the Administrative Court ruled not to accept the lawsuit filed by Radio Hamdi Al-Kanisi, in his capacity as the former head of the Media Syndicate, against the Supreme Council for Media and Cleopatra Media for Satellite Channels (Sada Al-Balad), which demands the revocation of the license of the Sada Al-Balad satellite channel and the banning of the journalist Ahmed Schubert, the former broadcaster of the channel From the media appearance, to the absence of the administrative decision.

The judgment was issued under the leadership of Counselor Fathi Ibrahim Muhammad Tawfiq, Vice President of the State Council and President of the Court, and the membership of the advisors Ibrahim Abdul-Ghani, Fathi Muhammad al-Sayed Hilal, Raafat Muhammad Abdul Hamid Ali, Hamid Muhammad Mahmoud al-Murali, Ahmed Dahi and Ahmed Jalal Zaki, the deputies of the State Council.

In his lawsuit, Al-Knessy demanded the cancellation of the license issued for the (Sada Al Balad and Echo Al Balad 2 +) satellite project, and the consequences thereof, most notably the suspension of the channel’s satellite broadcast signal, and the cessation of its use of the frequency space allocated for audio and video communications for radio and television services and radio broadcasting stations In the Arab Republic of Egypt, the channel project did not enjoy investment guarantees and incentives due to the abuse and defamation of the (With Schubert) program, which is broadcast on the Sada Al-Balad satellite channel. He also called for preventing the eighth defendant, Ahmed Abdel Aziz Schubert, from appearing in media programs And satellite TV channels.

In the merits of its ruling, the court stated that Al-Knessy entered the path of litigation, both criminal and civil, in order to defend against the abuse and defamation of the eighth defendant – (Ahmed Abdulaziz Schubert) – during his presentation of the program (With Schubert), which was broadcast at the time on the Sada Al-Balad satellite channel, This is achieved by achieving his right to push this infringement, without mentioning the suspension or cancellation of the license to broadcast this channel, which broadcasts on its screen many and varied programs that millions of Egyptians and others are keen to watch, and thus the penalty of stopping the broadcast may be prolonged or canceled.

The court confirmed that the papers were devoid of evidence that Cleopatra Media for satellite channels violated the terms of the license issued to it to broadcast the satellite channel (Echo of the Country and Echo of the Country 2+) or that the aforementioned channel violated a fundamental provision of the provisions of the Law Regulating the Press and the Media and the Supreme Council for Media Regulation promulgated by Law No. 180 of 2018, or that the media material that it broadcast through a program with Schubert would have affected the tranquility and security of the Egyptian society, or that it violates the values, constants and traditions of society, and then as the defendant’s administrative body refrained from canceling the license to broadcast that channel, its abstention does not constitute A negative decision contrary to the law can be challenged before the judiciary of the Council of States, the matter with which the court decides not to accept this request due to the absence of the administrative decision.

Regarding the request to prevent Ahmed Schubert from appearing in media programs and satellite television channels, the court held that the decision to prevent the absolute appearance of any Egyptian citizen, regardless of his thought, opinion or expression, contradicts the most basic rights of the Egyptian citizen in a country whose constitution preceded the affirmation of freedom Opinion and expression from the 1923 Constitution until now, whoever appeared on the media and had insulted and defamed an individual, the latter must enter the competent court, both criminal and civil, to ward off the assault he suffered in the past, and preventing future absolute appearances without knowledge of what the person will speak is confiscation When it is not possible to confiscate it, stoning the unseen, and diminishing the right of the Egyptian citizen to appear in the media or to display what he might see as an idea to the people.

Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here