It said Clearview failed to inform citizens that it was collecting billions from their photos, among other abuses, and ordered it to stop further processing of residents’ personal data.
The regulator said Clearview apparently failed to process people’s data “in a manner that they would likely expect or be fair”, and also alleged that the company failed to obtain a legal reason to collect the data, did not meet GDPR standards for biometric data, and failed to obtain over a process that prevented the data from being kept indefinitely, and also failed to inform UK residents of what was happening to them.
The ICO noted that Clearview’s services have been used on a free trial basis by a number of UK law enforcement agencies, “but that trial has been discontinued and Clearview AI Inc’s services are no longer available in the UK”.
The images in Clearview AI Inc’s database are likely to include data from a large number of people from the UK, and may have been collected without people’s knowledge from information publicly available online, including social media platforms.
The UK and Australia opened a joint investigation into Clearview AI last year, and regulators were concerned about Clearview’s practice of collecting data and collecting images from social media sites such as Facebook.
It also sells that data to law enforcement agencies, allegedly allowing them to identify criminals or victims. However, the company’s business practices have raised several privacy concerns, and Clearview AI said it is considering an appeal, according to the New York Times.
In a statement, company attorney Kelly Hagedorn said:[كليرفيو فقط] provides publicly available information from the Internet to law enforcement agencies, “and my company and I have acted in the best interests of the UK and its people by helping law enforcement solve heinous crimes against children, the elderly and other victims of unscrupulous acts,” said Clearview AI CEO. , Hwan Tun, in a separate statement.
Earlier this month, Normal Australia issued a similar ruling, saying Clearview AI violated residents’ privacy by revoking their biometrics information, and the country’s OAIC ordered Clearview to “stop collecting facial images and biometric templates from individuals in Australia and destroy all facial images and biometric templates that have been collected.
In the US, the American Civil Liberties Union recently sued Clearview for violating Illinois laws. Twitter, Google, and YouTube all sent cease-and-desist letters to the company, claiming it violated their terms of service. Facebook also demanded that Clearview stop scraping its data.
The company told the New York Times that the fine would be the first that Clearview would face, and the ICO wrote that it can still appeal the ruling with the commissioner, so the fine and enforcement “may be subject to change,” and the ICO expects to make a final decision by mid-2022.